Does the iPhone replace the point-and-shoot camera?

I have had an iPhone for years. It goes everywhere with me, so I always have a camera ready. I also have a Canon G12 that I don’t use very often, even though it’s a great camera (and was really expensive). It’s small but I still only take it on trips and special occassions. So, I guess in many ways, my iPhone really has replaced my camera. Mostly because of the convenience. My iPhone 4 takes great photos, and I can edit them and change the filters right on the phone. I can order prints right from my phone and 9 times out of 10 they turn out pretty well, even as a 5×7 or 8×10.

The blogs on my blogroll don’t really cover this issue, mostly because they are instructional guides or app reviews. I did find a couple of articles on the web that make some pretty good arguments.

PC Magazine points out that while the iPhone lacks in optical zoom, it has a fast shutter speed that allows you to take lots of photos in sequence. They argue, however, that while the iPhone still provides a great camera, if you’re going to be somewhere, like a family event or vacation, the iPhone is always going to beat the iPhone in terms of quality.

Ars Technica tested out the theory and compared iPhone pictures with other smart phones and digital cameras. They argue that while the iPhone doesn’t take photos as high quality as a digital camera the differences are fairly minimal, and the apps and tools make it strong enough to replace a digital camera.

ZDNet argues that the iPhone isn’t the only smart phone on the market threatening to replace the digital camera. HTC has a phone with an 8 megapixel cameramegapixel camera, just like the iPhone 4S.

While I don’t think that my iPhone has replaced my camera completely, it does always win due to convenience. I still wouldn’t ever replace it forever for my camera.


3 responses

  1. I think the quality of iPhone photography is really changing the direction of journalism. It’s pretty exciting and a bit scary at the same time. It indirectly effects my work, but I’ve stumbled across a few articles by photographers that really lay out the changes, and it seems like a pretty big deal. This article is the best I’ve found:

    • Good point, Marshal. It doesn’t affect my work or art or whatever you want to call it either, because I’m not a professional photographer. I guess the main point to all of this is that yeah, the iPhone is pretty great because you always have it with you and you can put a cool vintage filter on it, but an expensive camera is always going to take better pictures. That’s it. On the other hand, technology is going to advance (someday) to a point where we all have a really nice, high quality camera. It’s just going to be our cell phone.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s